Welcome to The Daly Blog! Here you will find my unedited, uncensored, unadulterated analysis of San Francisco politics. Check back regularly for the real deal -- no holds barred!


Originally posted January 4, 2009 at Fog City Journal.

The Case for John Avalos


District 11 Supervisor-Elect John Avalos and Supervisor Chris Daly on election night.
Photos by Luke Thomas

By Chris Daly

January 4, 2009

John Avalos, Community Organizer


District 11 Supervisor-Elect John Avalos

I first met John Avalos back in 1999 at his old place in the Excelsior, across from Monroe Elementary School. By this time, John was already well known in community organizing circles for his work at Coleman Advocates for Children and Youth. John and his partner, Karen Zapata, had opened up their home as the Excelsior mobilizing spot for Tom Ammiano’s campaign for Mayor. I can remember thinking how lucky we were to have such a great connection in the Excelsior, a neighborhood that had been notoriously difficult for progressives.

Between 2000 and 2004, John served as the Director of Organizing for Coleman Advocates for Children and Youth and as Political Director for Justice for Janitors, SEIU Local 1877. At Coleman, John led the citywide outreach effort to pass the reauthorization of the Children’s Fund. He also brought Coleman to the next level of advocacy around the City budget, organizing service providers and residents to directly engage on the defining questions facing City Hall decision-makers. At Justice for Janitors, John mobilized political support for 2 contract campaigns, ensuring that over 2000 workers received wage increases while preserving healthcare and retirement benefits.

City Hall Savvy

In early 2005, I invited John to work as a Legislative Assistant in my office. It was one of the best decisions I have made as a Supervisor. Over the last 4 years, I watched as John Avalos adroitly managed legislative and political affairs, always taking time to hear from everyone while watching out for our City’s most vulnerable.

Most notably, John was able to use his experience as an organizer to open City Hall’s doors to ensure that the voices of San Francisco’s most vulnerable communities were clearly heard during budget deliberations. John was able to demystify the budget process for community stakeholders while coordinating sometimes-tedious budget discussions between Supervisor offices, the Budget Analyst, Controller, and Mayor’s Budget Office. John played much of this role at City Hall even in the years that I didn’t Chair the Budget Committee. Through John’s work, tens of millions of dollars worth of vital services for childcare, health and mental health programs, park restorations, and senior support were saved from the chopping block. And tens of millions more were added for affordable housing and other programs.

Let’s be honest here, there are several Legislative Assistants that are more involved in the day-to-day running of local government than many members of the Board. John was one of these “leg aides” and was known as the go-to-guy on budget matters. His even-handed work on the City budget drew strong praise across the political spectrum with accolades from Supervisors Sean Elsbernd and Ross Mirkarimi!

On the Frontline for Justice

We all have some experience in supporting a candidate for office and then being disappointed with their performance once elected. Maintaining the accountability of elected officials to the progressive communities who elect them is as important as winning elections in the first place. Over the years I’ve noticed that there are 2 indicators of how responsive a politician will be to progressive politics. The first is rooted-ness in community. The second is sense of justice.

While John’s roots in community are deep, his desire for social justice is even stronger.

In 1999, when John Avalos learned of the wrongful conviction of David Moreno and Justin Pacheco for a murder they did not commit, he launched a media campaign through We Interrupt This Message to free the two Latino youth from jail. By generating national coverage of the case and, generally, of racism in the criminal justice system, John was able to help Moreno and Pacheco win a not guilty verdict on all charges and their freedom. You can’t find John’s fingerprints on this case. He didn’t do it for personal gain or advantage. He did it because it was the right thing to do.

John has witnessed the injustice that the system can deal out, and it doesn’t just inform his outlook. It drives John to fight for justice at every turn.

Perseverance Through Adversity

My other measure for elected officials is how they respond to crises, which seem to come up far too often in local government. When it comes to tough times, the Avalos family has been put to the test. John’s daughter Rene was born 16 weeks early during a family trip. Rene battled for her life, and after 4 months and 2 hospitals, she made it home. Through it all, John was a Super-Dad. Not only was he glued to Rene’s bedside, he also navigated the complicated hospital bureaucracies and managed interactions with doctors, nurses, and hospital administrators to make sure Rene got the care she needed. Faced with the adversity of his first child’s life in the balance, separated from his home, and with skyrocketing medical bills, John was able to draw from a community of support, and rally through.


John Avalos, Emiliano, Rene and Karen Zapata.

John Avalos for President of the Board

I support John Avalos for Board President because I believe he is the best choice to lead the new progressive Board during these tough times. His progressive politics are grounded in decades of community and labor organizing work and a profound desire for social justice. John is universally liked and respected and has an uncanny ability to bring people together.

Supervisor-elect Avalos may know more about the City budget than I do, even with my 8 years on the Board, thrice as Budget Chair. This is important because, with the current financial crisis, the City budget is likely to occupy the new Board for the better part of the next 2 years. It would be smart for the Board to elect the Supervisor with the most hands-on budget experience to our top leadership spot.

John has assembled what will be the most experienced and diverse staff at the Board. Rachel Redondiez brings 8 years at the Board with her own impressive record of community and labor organizing. Francis Hsieh has 4 years at the Board plus another 2 as an aide in Sacramento. She comes back to City Hall from her position as Deputy Director of NARAL Pro-Choice California. Coupled with John’s 4 years at City Hall, the Avalos office isn’t just going to be prepared; they are ready to lead on day one.

Despite all this experience, John Avalos will be a new face for change in San Francisco politics. This little piece here is probably the most extensive column ever published about John. John’s fresh face fits neatly with the mantra for progressive change that has just swept across the country. With a community organizer and relative outsider set to take the keys to the White House, a John Avalos Presidency at the Board would make for very good symbolism.

This fall, John assembled one of the most sophisticated and well-organized progressive political campaigns that this City’s seen. Like Eric Mar and David Chiu, he took some of downtown’s toughest hits and proved his political mettle. John has helped politically transform what was a conservative neighborhood into one that is very much in play for progressives. (In addition to electing John, District 11 was one of five to support the Affordable Housing Charter Amendment.)

The recent release of Gus Van Sant’s biopic not only elevates the stage for the San Francisco Board of Supervisors; it also provides us with the opportunity to turn the tables on the definition of the Supervisor from the Excelsior. Think about the meaning of a progressive Latino Board President, from the neighborhood that used to be known for producing Dan White.

John Avalos is ready to walk in a proud line of progressive Board Presidents, as a community and labor organizer who has battled through adversity with a passion for social justice.

What do the San Francisco Chronicle and Bill O’Reilly have in common?

VICTORY PARTY

Co-hosted by

San Francisco Labor Council

&

San Francisco Democratic Party

Thursday, November 20th

7:00 PM

628 Divisadero Street

(at Fell)

We hope you can join us to celebrate the tremendous victories we won on November 4th !

Please call Emily Nelson at (415) 440-4809

for more information or to RSVP.

OPEIU3 AFL-CIO 11

From: John Avalos

Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 5:25 AM
To: Buchanan, Wyatt
Subject: Dude, the preferred nomenclature is . . .

Hi Wyatt

You’re using some patently biased language here. The preferred nomenclature is "progressive" rather than the value laden "far" or "ultra left."

The Chron has typically used moderates and progressives, so it looks like manipulation when it uses this new terminology. Is this your language or the editors?

Let’s save the biased language for the opinion pages and keep it out of our news coverage.

Sincerely,
John Avalos

From: Cooper, Audrey

Date: Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:24 PM
Subject: RE: Dude, the preferred nomenclature is . . .
To: John Avalos

Dear Mr. Avalos,

Thank you for writing to Wyatt about this issue. We appreciate your feedback. However, just because a term is the preferred nomenclature of a political group does not mean we are bound to use it in the newspaper. As you’ve probably noticed, we only have chosen to use these adjectives to describe the city’s political factions in stories about the DCCC or the tussle for control of the board.

We decided to stop using the word "progressive" because it is a politically loaded term that doesn’t mean much to our readers. Far from being biased, we believe that this decision makes our reporting politically neutral.

While "progressive" may be the preferred term of some politicians - and, of course, they are free to use it to describe themselves - it doesn’t describe where they sit on the traditional political spectrum.

We believe using adjectives such as "far left" and "ultra liberal" more accurately describe city politicians and policies in that broader context.

Thank you very much for your time and interest in this issue. As always, we are most interested in accurately reporting on what happens in the city and we believe that this policy helps us to do that. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,

Audrey Cooper

Assistant Metro Editor

From: John Avalos

Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 1:04 PM
To: Cooper, Audrey
Subject: Re: Dude, the preferred nomenclature is . . .

Dear Audrey:

Thank you for your reply. I was throwing in a little humor here, albeit obscure — a reference to the Big Lebowski.

Having said that, I do believe the Chron’s use of "ultra left" and "far left" is completely biased. After all, who’s the arbiter here about what "ultra left" and "far left are?" What standard are you using and where did it come from? Seems pretty made up to me. Very rarely or better yet, never do I here progressives talk about themselves in these terms. The Chron’s making it up out of whole cloth.

It’s unbelievable, that you would even try to justify your use of this language.

Lastly, if any term is completely meaningless it’s "moderate." I don’t recall there being a moderate political movement or ideology. A Classical Greek philosophy maybe, but not a political movement like the Progressive Movement .  Progressives established labor laws, the women’s right to vote and regulations of our workplaces and food production.

I don’t believe Moderates can claim any such movement or transformation of our government institutions. If there’s something they can champion it’s ameliorating the effects of change or fighting against perennial progressive issues such as single payer health care, taxing high profits and rent control .

Thank you for your response. I really appreciate your sharing with me the Chronicle’s rationale, however shaky it may be.

Sincerely,
John Avalos


From: Cooper, Audrey

Date: Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:24 PM
Subject: RE: Dude, the preferred nomenclature is . . .
To: John Avalos

Dear Mr. Avalos,

We will probably have to agree to disagree. We could discuss it issue by issue but I don’t think that’s very useful. I guess I would only try to convince you that the words are simply adjectives and to ascribe some political bias to them seems to imply that it is somehow wrong to be at one end of the political spectrum or the other. To us, it’s all real
estate.

This discussion reminds me of a time in college when one of my professors asked all the feminists to raise their hands. Nobody did. And she yelled at us, pointing out that feminists simply believed in equal rights but that we had been talked out of embracing the label.

Best of luck with your campaign. Hope to meet you soon.

Sincerely,

Audrey Cooper

Assistant Metro Editor

In a post more fitting for GavinWatch than the SF Chronicle, former Chronicle editor Phil Bronstein criticized Gavin Newsom for his role in aiding the proponents of Proposition 8.

If you’re a liability but you keep reminding people you’re there, it’s gone beyond commitment to a cause and into the narrower world of self-importance.

Going from bad to worse, Bronstein takes the Mayor to task for everything from his drinking problem to the dying vegetables in his “victory garden.” All but declaring Newsom’s bid to become Governor dead, Bronstein writes, “Maybe he’ll get a legacy appointment to the Senate if Dianne is governor.” Harsh.

But back in their suites at 5th and Mission, the bosses at the Chron re-anted in their war against all things progressive in San Francisco. In today’s Chronicle “news” coverage of the local election, Heather Knight admits to fitting "the facts" into the story provided to her by her corporate editors – that while “left leaning” candidates for Supervisor may be winning, SF voters are “surprisingly conservative on issues.”

Progressive (not ultra-liberal ) candidates swept the election in SF — from President to Community College Board. In an election where hundreds of thousands were spent attacking candidates for their opposition to JROTC, San Franciscans elected progressive School Board members who support alternative leadership development programs.

Despite getting outspent over $10 million to a few hundred thousand on ballot measures, progressives still won more than we lost — Yes on E, recall reform; Yes on J, Historic Preservation Commission; No on L, Community Justice Center; Yes on M, rent control; Yes on N, O, and Q, new revenues; No on P, takeover of the Transportation Authority; Yes on T, substance abuse treatments services; Yes on U, de-funding the war. Hardly a conservative sweep of the measures!

Of course, there is a significant legal difference between passing a measure and defeating one that would do the opposite. In this election, no significant bad measure passed – on the propositions, progressive gained ground and lost none (the only conservative measure to pass was Proposition V, the JROTC policy statement that is non-binding.) I guess it’s not surprising that this is not discussed in the Chron’s coverage.

Of course the progressive wins in the Supervisor races is the big news in SF politics. With well over $600,000 spent to defeat good, neighborhood-based progressive candidates, downtown came up empty once again. After their brutal assault on me 2 years ago, you’d think they’d learn their lesson. I guess old habits die hard.

Maybe one day we will have a newspaper that goes out and covers the news, based on the real facts. Until then, go to the blogs to find out what’s really going on.

Next Page »